ICC Logistics Services

The Debrief: peak 2026 is set, and the leverage just moved

by | Industry News, Rate Increases, Supply Chain, Tariffs

We're Here to Help

Talk to an ICC Logistics expert today and find the money you never knew was missing!

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail

The Debrief in five lines:

  • Peak 2026 will be the most expensive on record. Every national parcel carrier plus USPS has raised holiday fees.
  • Amazon completed the lineup and is now the largest US parcel carrier by volume, yet still won’t charge a volume-based peak surcharge.
  • UPS and FedEx do charge one, taxing shippers on how far peak volume runs above a baseline. That gap is leverage at the table, whether or not you ever ship a box with Amazon.
  • The move: model that surcharge against your real peak profile, then put the baseline, the trigger, and a cap on the table with your incumbents.
  • Also this week: Canada’s retaliatory tariffs take effect, a Sept. 29 pharmaceutical tariff deadline looms, diesel holds near $5.60, and truckload capacity stays tight heading into the late-2026 bid.

_____________________________

Peak 2026 will be the most expensive on record, and the increases are climbing in lockstep across every carrier that matters. Now that Amazon Shipping has filed its 2026 surcharges, the lineup is complete: every national carrier plus USPS is up for the season, and the industry is on pace for the highest ground parcel cost per package ever recorded.

We’ve already written that cost story. What’s worth your attention this week isn’t that the fourth carrier went up. It is what the fourth carrier being there at all does to your position at the table.

The newest entrant changes the negotiation, not just the price sheet

A national carrier now exists that is open to any business and prices deliberately underneath UPS and FedEx, one that has already passed both to become the largest US parcel carrier by volume, and that fact is leverage whether or not you ever ship a box with it.

This is Amazon Shipping’s first peak season as a service open to all businesses, not just merchants selling on Amazon.com, and it has been chasing volume with lower rates aimed squarely at UPS and FedEx customers. For most of our clients, the relevant question is not “should we move to Amazon?” It is “what does a credible alternative do to a rate conversation we used to have with no alternative at all?” Carriers price partly on how captive an account is. A shipper with nowhere else to go has no counterweight to a peak accessorial or a general rate increase, and carriers price accordingly. A credible alternative gives that shipper a counterweight, and that is worth more at the negotiating table than the headline per-package number that will get all the coverage.

The volume surcharge is where that leverage gets real

Amazon is not charging a volume-based peak surcharge for the second year running, while UPS and FedEx both levy one on larger shippers tied to how far peak volume runs above a baseline, and that single structural gap is the most useful thing in this entire filing.

Here is why it matters more than it looks.

The incumbent volume surcharge is triggered when your weekly peak volume exceeds a reference baseline set before the season, and it scales with the gap. The further above baseline you run, the more you pay per package. Read plainly, that is a tax on the exact thing peak season produces, which is more volume, and it falls hardest on the shippers who are growing. A carrier that charges nothing here is not offering a cosmetic discount. For a growing shipper, the true peak-cost gap between Amazon and the incumbents is wider than the headline fees suggest, because the incumbent bill quietly includes a growth penalty that Amazon does not levy.

That gap is also the most negotiable and most mismodeled line in the peak bill. The baseline period, the volume threshold that triggers the surcharge, and any cap on it are all levers, and most shippers never scrutinize the reference window the number is calculated against. Two moves come out of this. The first is to demand your incumbent baseline be re-based or capped, using Amazon’s zero-surcharge structure as the market comparison that says this cost is not a law of nature. The second is the credible threat to divert marginal or overflow peak volume, which is precisely the volume that triggers the surcharge, to a carrier that does not charge for it. You do not need a wholesale migration to make either move land. You need the alternative to exist and the modeling to show what the surcharge actually costs against your real peak profile.

One honest caveat to keep the advice credible:

Leverage is not the same as migration. Amazon Shipping is the newer network, and lane coverage and service commitments deserve real diligence before anyone reroutes committed volume. The smart play for most shippers is to use the alternative as a negotiating counterweight and possibly an overflow valve for the surcharge-triggering peak, not to tear up an incumbent relationship on price alone

The rest of the peak set, briefly

UPS, FedEx, and USPS all raised holiday fees for 2026, and the structure under the headlines did not change. We covered this in full when UPS and FedEx filed. The short version for the roundup reader is that the increases concentrate in the accessorials and demand fees that are easy to miss and hard to plan around, stacked on a year of rate hikes already sitting in your rates. If you haven’t modeled your own peak profile against the new schedules, you are planning the fourth quarter on last year’s math.

Fuel

The latest EIA reading puts on-highway diesel at $5.599 a gallon, easing about five cents on the week but still running roughly $1.87 above where it sat a year ago. That figure is current as of today and subject to change with the next EIA print on September 9. The mechanism point holds regardless: as diesel eases, the surcharge tables now keep the percentage elevated longer than the old structure did, so the relief you would expect from a lower pump price shows up smaller on the invoice.

Tariff and regulatory watch

The tariff relief that looked possible earlier this year has not arrived; the burden has been rebuilt on more durable legal footing, and it is still moving, so import-exposed shippers should treat landed cost as a moving number rather than a settled one.

The freshest signal landed this week:

Canada’s retaliatory tariffs on more than 700 US-origin products take effect Sept 8, at rates of 15, 25, or 50 percent matched to the corresponding US rate, with the counter-tariff on US steel and aluminum stepping up to 50 percent. Any client shipping northbound should confirm which of their products are on the list before the next load moves. Underneath that, the broad 10 percent import surcharge that ran through the spring lapsed on July 24 and was replaced the same day by a new layer of 10 to 12.5 percent on products from roughly 60 economies, so the headline changed while the cost did not go away. The effective US tariff rate now sits near its highest in decades. The nearest hard deadline for planning is September 29, when Section 232 tariffs on patented pharmaceuticals and their active ingredients reach every remaining importer in scope, at rates that can run to 100 percent unless an onshoring or pricing agreement lowers them; generics and biosimilars are excluded. Several more sector investigations are expected to close before year-end. None of it is settled, and that is the planning point: model landed cost against your actual sourcing, and revisit it as the list moves.

Two more on the watch list. The EU product-identifier requirement becomes mandatory November 1, dropping item-level data rules on B2C imports right as peak volume moves, so any client selling into the EU wants that data flow tested before then, not during it. In New York City, the Delivery Protection Act has reached a city council supermajority; if it passes, it would require last-mile operators to license facilities and employ drivers directly, raising per-package delivery costs in the city and likely drawing litigation. Worth watching, not yet worth planning around.

Truckload

The market has moved into a new cycle this year, and the late-2026 bid is now the decision that sets your 2027 cost base. The recent reads make the escape-valve point concrete rather than theoretical. Aggregate spot rates ran 43 percent above prior-year levels in June, contract rates followed them up 13 percent instead of holding flat, and spot has been sitting above contract, which is the signal that tightness is moving out of the spot market and into contract renewals. The cause is not a demand surge. It is capacity leaving the road: driver scarcity, regulatory enforcement, and years of limited fleet investment. The Logistics Manager’s Index transportation-capacity reading hit 28.4 in July, tying the second-sharpest contraction in the index’s history, then eased to 40.0 in August as some capacity came back, still in contraction but off the extreme. The takeaway holds either way: the market has little slack to absorb peak, and September is effectively the last month to rebalance routing guide carrier depth before peak makes that a reactive scramble rather than a planned move.

For flatbed shippers there is a separate supply-side story. Flatbed tightness has run well above year-ago levels as industrial, infrastructure, and data center projects commit equipment to multi-month timelines, and that equipment is not releasing back into the dry van pool during the seasonal soft patch.

On the calendar

  • Sept. 29 – Section 232 tariffs on patented pharmaceuticals and their ingredients reach all remaining importers in scope.
  • Oct. 15 – Amazon fulfillment holiday fees begin (FBA, Remote Fulfillment, Multi-Channel, Buy with Prime), plus the 3.5% fuel and logistics surcharge.
  • Oct. 25 – Amazon Shipping peak surcharges begin.
  • Nov. 1 – EU product-identifier (PID) requirement becomes mandatory for B2C imports.
  • Nov. 22 – Dec. 26 – Peak-of-peak window across carriers, where surcharges hit their highest rate.
  • Jan. 16, 2027 – Amazon Shipping peak surcharges end.

What we would do this week

  • Model the incumbent volume-based peak surcharge against your real peak profile, not the headline fees, so you know what your growth is actually costing you.
  • Put the baseline, the trigger threshold, and a cap on the table with UPS and FedEx, using the zero-surcharge alternative as the market comparison.
  • Identify the marginal peak volume you could credibly divert, and price it, so the threat to move it is real rather than rhetorical.

The headline increases are the part everyone will see this week. The leverage is in the structure underneath, and the newest carrier just handed you a piece of it. This is the window to model what it is worth before the season removes your room to act.

That modeling is exactly what a Logistics Cost Review is built to do. We run your actual shipping profile against the current peak schedules, quantify what the volume-based surcharge is really costing you, and show you where the leverage sits while you still have room to use it. If you’d rather walk into your next carrier conversation knowing your numbers than guessing at them, reach out and we’ll set one up.

Sources

Parcel and peak pricing

Fuel

Tariffs and trade

Regulatory

Truckload

Facebooktwitterlinkedinmail

Search by Category

We're Here to Help

Talk to an ICC Logistics expert today and find the money you never knew was missing!