FedEx Increases Peak Additional Handling Surcharge

Effective June 21, 2021, FedEx will be increasing their Peak Additional Handling Surcharges.

FedEx, in their announcement last week stated they have been keeping package volume moving throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, which they certainly have.  FedEx also stated that “the impact of the virus continues to generate elevated volumes, high demand for capacity and increased operating costs across our network. To provide our customers with the best possible service during this challenging time, the following surcharge increases are being implemented:”

The surcharges that will be affected by these increases are as follows:

  • Peak Oversize Surcharge
  • Peak Additional Handling Surcharge
  • Peak Residential Delivery Surcharge
  • International Surcharges which were formally named “Temporary Surcharges” and are now named “Peak Surcharges.

Full details are available by clicking the link below which will take you to the official FedEx announcement.  As we have stated over and over again, controlling these continually spiraling shipping costs MUST become an immediate priority for every company regardless of their size.  If you need help determining how to control shipping costs, please contact us immediately as we continually help our clients improve their bottom lines during these very difficult times.

Need help making sense and clarity on FedEx Surcharges?  Contact us today to learn more!

Ocean Freight General Rate Increase Announcement

Attention importers, get ready for another round of General Rate Increases for ocean shipments from various Asia ports to North America.

Effective December 1, 2020 a General Rate Increase (GRI) has been filed for all cargo imported from Asia ports of loading, to U.S.A., Canada, and Mexico ports/ramps of discharge.

The proposed increases are as follows:

General Rate Increase – Effective Date: December 1, 2020

USD     900 / 20′

USD   1,000 / 40′

USD   1,125 / 40′ HQ

USD   1,125 / 40′ Reefer

USD   1,266 / 45′

USD   1,600 / 53′

Looking to understand how this affects your business? Check out our international logistics page to learn a bit more about how we help clients take control of rising rates.

Are We Willing to Change?

That question, and others were the focus of the recent 29th Annual Study of Logistics and Transportation Trends reported by Mary Holcomb, PH.D., professor, University of Tennessee; Christopher Boone, PH.D., assistant professor, Mississippi State University and Karl B. Manrodt, PH.D., professor, Georgia College and State University.

The key questions posed in the study were a direct result of factors highlighted in Tom Goodwin’s book, “Digital Darwinism,” including “The most profound and the very best questions we never dare to ask are: What would your business look like if it was created today? What would it do? How would it do it?”

Digital Darwinism suggests that companies were historically designed to evolve and improve over time.  But in today’s world, technology and societal change no longer afford businesses that luxury.  Therefore, companies must challenge themselves to ask the hard question, are we willing to change?

The study’s respondents numbered just under three hundred and the results were very interesting.  When asked to balance cost and service, just over 54% of the respondents claimed their strategy was a balance of cost and service objectives, defined as “being all things to all people.” 13% responded their focus was on product and market innovation, 27% stated their focus was on Customer Service and 6% stated they were focusing on Cost Leadership.  

When asked about striving to achieve maximum profitability, 36% of the respondents stated that maximizing profitability was critical, 30% stated increasing customer satisfaction was their goal, 12% stated they were focusing on maximizing asset utilization and 22% stated they were focused on reducing costs. 

The study also revealed that in the prior three year’s surveys, the two competing objectives were “increasing customer satisfaction” and “reducing costs.”  In the current study however the goal for 39% of the respondents was “maximizing profitability” an increase of nearly 29% over the prior year’s study results.  On the other side of the coin, “increasing customer satisfaction” and “reducing costs” both declined 8.5% and 18.9% respectively.  I don’t know about you, but the responses from this year and prior year surveys all seem to be sending a very similar message, but perhaps saying it a little differently.

No matter how you slice these survey results, it is quite clear that continuing the ongoing effort to optimize the transportation and logistics processes in business today requires a strong focus on balancing cost and service offerings, while at the same time striving to achieve maximize profitability.    

However, due to Covid-19 challenges, some of these corporate initiatives will surely be tested as to their overall effectiveness in achieving a company’s goals.  For example, when a company states that their main objective is balancing cost and service, how easily will that be accomplished when capacity issues are driving up costs significantly?  Clearly, shippers have been and will continue to pay more for various transportation services.  

Does reducing costs mean selecting carrier partners who’s service offerings are less than stellar, but does provide a reduction in shipping expenses?  And, if that is the case, how does that play into providing the best possible service to its customers.  

Maximizing profitability has its own set of challenges including first and foremost understanding exactly what a company’s current transportation and logistics expenses are so they can actually benchmark how profitability improvements are effecting their company.  

And while this is a pretty basic place to start, many companies still struggle with getting their arms around all of their costs when various facilities and/or multiple divisions are part of the company structure.  

In a recent discussion with a new client, they indicated that their overall spend was in excess of $500,000 annually, however when we began gathering the actual shipment data, one of their shipping facilities alone accounted for over $800,000 in annual expenses.  So, how can you track and/or improve profitability if you don’t even know what the current expenditures are?

Another point worth mentioning is the corporate structure alignment and which group or groups have responsibility for the overall transportation and logistics expenses.  In many companies the responsibility is shared and therefore the decision making process on what steps to take to improve profitability can cause additional challenges that sometimes never have a proper solution and therefore the company profits never really do get optimized.

So where does all of this leave us?  Great question!  We suggest a “getting back to basics” approach where the starting point must be to pull out all of the stops necessary to effectively address the following issues:

  1. Is the company absolutely sure it has calculated all of the transportation and logistics expenses it is responsible for?
  2. Is the company sure that it has billed out all of the proper costs to its customers that may be part of their prepaid and add sales terms?
  3. Is the company sure that all of their vendors have paid all of the freight costs they are responsible for paying?
  4. Is the company sure that their purchase and sales terms as they relate to transportation and logistics costs are being properly adhered to?
  5. Has the company engaged an independent third party audit firm to audit all of their invoices, not only for correctness of charges, but also for duplicate payment and duplicate billings, as well as for freight term considerations?

While these sound like and actually are good and basic business practices, there are many companies that have not taken these steps into account and therefore cannot be assured that their profit maximizing efforts will ever actually be met.

parcel auditing service how it works at ICC Logistics

The Three Biggest Mistakes Parcel Shippers Make!

Several key factors in today’s fast-paced business world are driving the explosive growth of online shopping.  These factors, such as millennials, (and others for that matter),desire to shop on line, rather than in physical stores; the growth of entrepreneurs starting new businesses to sell just about anything online; and manufacturers needing to sell at the wholesale as well as at the retail level.

The net result of these factors and others, is more and more companies are utilizing parcel carriers to deliver their products to the ultimate consumer.  With this growth comes a need and responsibility to clearly and thoroughly understand all of the rules, regulations, rates, shipping options and legal ramifications of dealing with the parcel industry as a whole.  Today, we’d like to explain what we believe are the Three Biggest Mistakes Parcel Shippers Make.

  1. Not Benchmarking Competing Carrier’s Rates and Services– The first mistake we believe parcel shipper’s make is not understanding all of the options available to them from the ever-growing list of parcel carrier service providers.  Time and time again we witness shippers who never step outside their comfort zone to interview, review and analyze various competing carrier services to benchmark whether they have a good deal or not.  The reality is, if a shipper does not continually benchmark their services and rates they are paying, by default, they accept the status quo and oftentimes that means paying much more for transportation services than they really need to.

Yes, we thoroughly understand that switching volumes of business from a long time preferred parcel carrier may come with some implementation pain.  However, if a parcel shipper does not test the competitive waters they may be boxing themselves into paying higher rates year after year.  Another key point to take into consideration is service level comparisons.  Oftentimes, regional parcel carriers can deliver products faster in certain lanes compared to some national carriers.  What about USPS as an alternative?  This is not your father’s Post Office any longer.

Some additional food for thought; do cable companies, home alarm companies, mobile phone service providers, and other service companies charge their longtime customers more for services than they charge their new customers?  You bet they do and unless a parcel shipper analyzes all of the options available to them on an on-going basis, they will probably pay more year after year as well.  If a parcel carrier feels they have a “lock” on a shippers business, (primarily because the shipper has never utilized a bid process to evaluate the benefits of competing carriers), what incentive would that carrier have to publish lower rates?  That’s correct, absolutely none.  The fact is the incumbent carrier may turn out to be the best choice for a particular shipper, but unless that shipper benchmarks services and rates of competing carriers, they will never ever really be sure.

  1. Read The Fine Print, and More– Most parcel carriers provide their shipper customers with a pricing agreement or contract which outlines the various services to be provided and the associated rates and charges they have agreed to assess for those services.  Warning to parcel shippers!  Don’t just sign the agreement without reading it thoroughly to make sure all of the terms and conditions are EXACTLY as you and the carrier agreed to.  Here are several questions we would ask every parcel shipper who has recently negotiated a new pricing agreement or re-negotiated a contract with a parcel carrier.
  • Did you agree to a Guaranteed Service Refund Waiver with your parcel carrier sales representative?  No, then why is it now in your contract?
  • What Dimensional Weight Divisor did you and the parcel carrier agree would be published?  Is that the Divisor that is now published in your new contract?
  • Do you understand that many parcel carriers make their contracts subject to provisions of a service guide that is not a physical part of the transportation contract you are signing?
  • Do you know the parcel carriers can change the provisions of those service guides at will and do not need to specifically notify each and every one of the customers when they do?
  • Parcel carriers typically provide differing pricing incentives for various service levels, are you sure all of the discounts and incentives have in fact been published exactly as you and the parcel carrier agreed to in your negotiation sessions

Why ask these questions?  Precisely because for some parcel shippers these exact issues have arisen and many of these companies never identified them until it was too late; so our advice to all parcel and freight shippers for that matter is; Caveat Emptor, let the buyer beware!

And, one final point, a very important point; we strongly recommend that each and every parcel carrier contract, or any transportation or logistics services contract for that matter, should be reviewed by a                 qualified Transportation Attorney, before any of those contracts are signed.

  1. Continually Audit Parcel Carrier Invoices– Once the contract has been signed, all parcel shippers should ensure they have a qualified third party audit firm auditing each and every invoice to make sure the rates being charged are the rates the shipper agreed to in its pricing agreement or contract.  The auditors will also be able to file for refunds for Guaranteed Late Delivered packages, as long as the shipper has not waived their right to file such claims.

Parcel Audit firms also provide on-line access to their client’s pertinent shipping data and can even report results based on specific Key Performance Indicators (KPI’s) their shipper customers agree to.  They also provide continuous and meaningful reports on a variety of different metrics so the parcel shipper always has their finger on the pulse of what’s going on with their parcel shipping expenses.  We’ve all heard the statement, “you can’t manage what you can’t measure” and unless your firm has the technical expertise to generate this critical shipping data in-house, outsourced parcel audit firms have all the reporting power a parcel shipper would ever need.

Tony Nuzio, CEO of ICC Logistics, Featured In June 2016 TransDigest Article About “Damaged Shipments: What you need to know”

TransdigestAn article entitled, “Damaged Shipments: What you need to know” was just published in the June 2016 issue of TransDigest on Page 13. Written by ICC’s own Tony Nuzio, the article is based on ICC’s 7 step process for ensuring claims are settled properly and promptly.  Among the advice is knowing the importance of ease of scheduling an inspection of damaged goods, debunking the “15 day rule”, and differences in types of damages and how to approach them.  The article is chock-full of useful information and a must-read for any shipper, big or small.
A PDF of the article can be accessed and downloaded here: TransDigest, June 2016

Tony Nuzio, CEO of ICC Logistics, Featured In January 2016 TransDigest Article About UPS’ New Fee, “Third Party Billing Service”

trans-digestAn article about UPS’ “Third Party Billing Service” was just published in the January 2016 issue of TransDigest on Page 9. Written by ICC’s own Tony Nuzio, the article clarifies what shippers need to know about the new fee, which many shippers will begin to see on their weekly UPS invoices.

Tony suggests that, after reading the TransDigest article, shippers “take a close look at their weekly UPS invoices to evaluate and determine exactly what the total impact of this new fee will be on their business.” He also suggests that “shippers should make sure before they attempt to make a Third Party billed shipment via UPS in 2016 and beyond, that the intended payer of the freight charges does in fact have a valid account with UPS, or stand the risk of receiving chargebacks from UPS.”

A PDF of the article can be accessed and downloaded here: TransDigest, January 2016